Wednesday, 28 November 2018

M. M. Bakhtin (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin (Trs.) Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist. Austin & London: University of Texas Press.


Introduction - Michael Holquist



Heteroglossia is Bakhtin’s way of referring, in any utterance of any kind, to the peculiar interaction between the two fundamentals of communication. On the one hand, a mode of transcription must, in order to do its work of separating out texts, be a more or less fixed system. – 12



Epic and Novel



Towards the Methodology for the Study of the Novel



the novel is the sole genre that continues to develop, that is as yet uncompleted. – 19



Studying other genres is analogous to studying dead languages; studying the novel, on the other hand, is like studying languages that are not only alive, but still young. – 19



This ability (of parodying itself) of the novel to criticize itself is a remarkable feature of this ever-developing genre. – 20



the novel inserts into these other genres an indeterminacy, a certain semantic openendedness, a living contact with unfinished, still evolving contemporary reality. – 20



three basic characteristics that fundamentally distinguish the novel in principle from other genres: (1) its stylistic three-dimensionality, which is linked with multilanguage consciousness realized in the novel; (2) the radical change it effects in the temporal coordinates of the literary image; (3) the new zone opened by the novel for structuring literary images, the zone of maximal contact with the present in all its openendedness. – 21



The epic as a genre in its own right may, for our purposes, be characterized by three constitutive features: (1) a national epic past – in Goethe’s and Schiller’s terminology the “absolute past” – serves as the subject for the epic; (2) national tradition serves as the source for the epic; (3) an absolute epic distance separates the epic world from contemporary reality, that is, from the time in which the singer lives. -21



When the novel becomes the dominant genre, epistemology becomes the dominant discipline. – 22



From the Prehistory of Novelistic Discourse



Five different stylistic approaches to novelistic discourse may be observed:



1. the author’s portions alone in the novel are analyzed.

2. a neutral linguistic description of the novelist’s language

3. in a given novelist’s language, elements characteristic of his particular literary tendency are isolated

4. language is analyzed as the individual style of the given novelist

5. Novel’s devices are analyzed from the point of view of their effectiveness as rhetoric. – 30



One’s own language is never a single language: in it there are always survivals of the past and a potential for other languagedness that is more or less sharply perceived by the working literary and language consciousness. – 37



Expressing Time and Space in Novels (Chronotope)



ii. Apuleius and Petronius (Adventure-everyday novel)



·         Adventure novel of everyday life

i. The satyricon of Petronius

ii. The Golden Ass of Apuleius

·         The features are found in satire and Hellenistic diatribe, as well as works from Christian literature on the lives of saints



Characteristics



-          Mix of adventure-time and everyday-time; emergence of new type of adventure-time distinct from Greek adventure-time

-          Metamorphosis (development of the idea of metamorphosis)



iii. Ancient Biography or Autobiography



Passes through the course of a whole life.



iv. The problem of Historical Inversion and Folkloric Chronotope



v. Chivalric Romance



vi. The Function of the Rougue, Clown and Fool in the Novel



vii. The Rabelaisian Chronotope



viii. The Folkloric Bases of the Rabeliasian Chronotope



ix. The Idyllic Chronotope in the Novel



x. Concluding Remark



A literary work’s artistic unity in relationship to an actual reality is defined by its chronotope. – 93



Discourse in the Novel



Modern Stylistics & the Novel



Discourse in Poetry and Discourse in the Novel



the word does not exist in a neutral and impersonal language (it is not, after all, out of a dictionary that the speaker gets his words!), but rather it exists in other people’s mouths, in other people’s contexts, serving other people’s intentions: it is from there that one must take the wrd, and make it one’s own. – 108



Heteroglossia in the Novel



The Speaking person in the Novel



The speaking person in the novel is always, to one degree or another, an ideologue, and his words are always ideologemes. A particular language in a novel is always a particular way of viewing the world, one that strives for a social significance. – 121



What is hybridization? It is a mixture of two social languages within the limits of a single utterance, an encounter, within the arena of an utterance, between two different linguistic consciousness, separated from one another by an epoch, by social differentiation or by some other factor. – 129



The two Stylistic Lines of Development in the European Novel

Thursday, 22 November 2018

Menz, Florian (1989) “Manipulation strategies in newspapers: a program for critical linguistics” in Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse (ed.) Ruth Wodak: 227-249. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.


1. Introduction



2. “Critical Linguistics” - an extended model



3. The importance of the “Neue Kronenzeitung” in Austria



4. Trivial myths as means of ideologizing



4.1 The strategy of “black and white depiction”



4.2 “Mythical groups of reference”



4.3 Strategies for emotionalization



5. An example of miscarried ideologizing

Wednesday, 21 November 2018

van Dijk, Teun A. (1989) “Mediating racism: The role of the media in the reproduction of racism” in Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse (ed.) Ruth Wodak: 199-226. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.


2. Discourse and the reproduction of racism

The news media do not passively describe or record news events in the world, but actively (re-) construct them, mostly on the basis of many types of source discourses. – 203

3. Ethnic minorities in news media

Anti-racist position are often ignored or censored or their coverage by the media is limited to preferably violent demonstration and action. 204-205

Barred from public communication, and hence from persuasive, counter-prevailing power, minority groups are forced into forms of resistance that may attract public attention through media accounts, e.g., disobedience, disruption, or destruction. These will capture the attention of journalists precisely because they are consistent with both news values (negativity, violence, deviance) and with ethnic prejudice (minorities are deviant, violent). – 205

4. Properties of news about the ethnic minority groups

4.1 Presentation

Frequency and size

4.2 Topics and thematic structure

The study of discourse meaning or content may take place at the local level of words and  sentences, and on the global level of topics or themes, which we define in terms of semantic macrostructure. – 209

Thematic structures

4.3 Actor roles

Who is speaking?

4.4 Local meaning, style and perspective

5. Context and conclusions

The media in general and news media in particular play a central role in the very production mechanism of ethnic attitudes and racism. - 220

Wednesday, 14 November 2018

Quastoff, Uta M. (1989) “Social Prejudice as a Resource of Power: towards he functional ambivalence of stereotypes” in Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse (ed.) Ruth Wodak: 181-196. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

0. Introduction
1. Problems of definition
2. Functions of prejudice
2.1 Cognitive function
2.2 Innerpsychic functions
2.3 Social functions
3. The functional ambivalence of stereotypes between necessary and dangerous functions
4. A possible explanation

Moosmuller, Sylvia (1989) “Phonological Variation in Parliamentary Discussions” in Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse (ed.) Ruth Wodak: 165-180. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.


standard language variants is most often associated with intelligence, competence and status-related traits whereas dialect language variants are generally associated with sociability, social attractiveness and trustworthiness. – 165

2. Analysis of sociophonological variation
3. Political speech in parliament
4. Conclusion

Sunday, 11 November 2018

Wodak, Ruth (1989) “1968: The power of political jargon – a “Club-2” discussion” in Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse (ed.) Ruth Wodak: 137-163. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.


Introduction

Political groups need their own language and portray themselves via this language; they define their territory by means of their language; they signal their ideology through certain slogans and stereotypes; their ideological structure is joined together in a certain way and so is their argumentation. – 137

1. Political jargon-myth-ideology-text

1.1  Ideology

We shall use “ideology” and “myth” synonymously as described by Lemberg (1983) and Mannheim (1978). For both these authors these terms mean “systems of ideas which constitute and pilot the large power-blocks of our society.” (Lemberg 1983: 41) – 140

1.2 Democracy and ideology – Bordieu’s concept
1.3 Jargon
1.3 Further characteristics of jargon
2. The institution “club-2” and its significance
2.1 The setting
2.2 Presentation of self and image
3. The “club-2” of June 13th, 1978
4. Rudi Dutschke: “A socialist tries to find his role in society
4.1 Text-level: argumentative strategies and self-representation
4.2 Lexical level
4.3 Syntactic level
4.4 Summary
5. Daniel Cohn-Bendit, the “active fighter – never say die”!
5.1 Argumentative strategies and self representation: Text level
5.2 Lexical level
6. Summary

Friday, 9 November 2018

Holly, Werner (1989) “Credibility and Political Language” in Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse (ed.) Ruth Wodak: 115-135. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.




1. Faith in politicians
2. Grice’s ‘intentions’ and the problem of overtness
2.1 Communication, action, meaning

Herbert P. Grice developed his much discussed model of communication. This model starts out from the assumption that any action has a purpose, i.e. an intended effect, in the case of  communication a reaction r from the addressee. The crucial point of Grice’s construction for our subject seems to be that this effect should not be generated through some causal or conventional mechanism, but through the addressee’s recognition of the addresser’s intention to induce this effect. This has been formulated in the following three conditions:

(1) S intends that H shows r.
(2) S intends that H recognizes that (1)
(3) S intends that H shows r on the basis of his recognition of (1) – 116-117

Most philosophical and linguistic theories define ‘language’ as a means of mutual understanding. The view that language should disclose and not conceal thoughts has been defended ever since the time of Augustin. – 117

2.2 Conventions, understanding, responsibility

3. Two ways of ‘non-communicating’

3.1 The “running-board” technique

3.2 The ‘phantom-meaning” technique

4. Conditions for the use of political language

Monday, 5 November 2018

Sornig, Karl (1989) “Some remarks on linguistic strategies of persuasion” in Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse (ed.) Ruth Wodak: 95-113. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.


1. RHETORICAL USE OF LANGUAGE

Persuasion mus pre-eminently be seen as a stylistic procedure. – 96

Words can, in fact, be used as instruments of power and deception, but it is never the words themselves that should be dubbed evil and poisonous, as has become the fashion since the days of F. Mauthner. The responsibility for any damage that might have been done by using certain means of expressions still lies with the users, those who, not being able to alter the reality, try – through interpretative strategies – to change its reception and recognition by their interlocutors. – 96

By impressing or surprising somebody, the persuader tries to make his victim give up his own viewpoint and embrace that of the rhetorician, whereas in the case of flattery and the acting out of chummiess the recipient is convinced that persuader has given up his/her own point of view in favour of that of the persuaded. What is even more effective is when the victim gets the impression that both partners have had the same outlook on reality from the very beginning, in which case the persuader is regarded and accepted as one of the victim’s near and dear. – 96

1.1  Conviction vs. Seduction
1.2  Interlude on intelligibility
1.2.1     Coercive strategies
1.3  Instability of meaning and reduction of semantic content as a result of focusing and attempts at intensification
2. ARGUMENTATION
2.3 Don’t argue, quote
3. PERSUASIVE GRAMMAR
3.4 Phonetics and the magic power of similarity
4. THE LEXICON OF PERSUASION
4.1 The magic of tautology
4.2 Paraphrase
4.2.1 Euphemism
4.3 Semantic shift, albeit transitory, but with purpose
4.5 Key-words and their connotative force
4.5.1 Neologism
5. REMARKABLE UNMARKEDNESS: Simulation of reality of minds by imitation of linguistic variants of intimacy: the persuasive power of mame losn.

Friday, 2 November 2018

Brekle, Herbert E. (1989) “War with Words” in Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse (ed.) Ruth Wodak: 81-91. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.


1. Preliminary remarks

Someone wages war on others by means of words; someone seeks adversely to affect the conditions of other peoples’ lives, to obtain power over them, to rob them of their human dignity or, in the extreme case, of their physical existence, using among other means words, statements, texts. – 81

2. Some linguistic considerations

3. Propaganda and censorship (1914-1933)

3.1 A case study of a piece of propaganda of the Allies

3.2 Propaganda strategies of the allies

The methods and ingredients of British propaganda in the First World War are generally reduced to eight basic features:

1. Stereotypes (“bull-necked Prussian officer”)
2. names with negative connotations (“huns”)
3. selection and suppression of facts, often with palliative terms (retreats are called “straightening the front”)
4. reports of cruelty (“Belgian nuns violated”, “hands of children cut off”)
5. slogans (“a war to end all wars”)
6. one-sided reporting (small victories are exaggerated, large defeats are glossed over)
7. unmistakably negative characterization of the enemy (“German militarists)
8. the so-called “bandwagon effect” (“every patriot joins up”) 

He (Hitler) rebuked the Germans for not having understood the value of propaganda as a terrible psychological weapon; all statements issued by the government and the press, both internal and external in nature must be subjective and one-sided on all questions, they must appeal to the primitive feelings of the masses and they must endlessly repeat the same few points. – 87

4. Glimpses on the present-day situation

4.1 A Bavarian example

5. Conclusion