Monday, 30 April 2018

Hampe, Beate (2000) “Facing up to the Meaning of ‘face up to’: A Cognitive Semantico-Pragmatic Analysis of an English Verb-Particle Construction” in Constructions in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam 1997 (eds.) Ad Foolen & Frederike van der Leek: 81-101. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

in cognitive grammar terms, in each of these transitive constructions the subject-NP instantiates a trajectory whose ‘active zone’ (the face or front) is situated opposite a landmark which is instantiated by the direct object NP. – 86

It comes as a no surprise that humans can face abstract things the same way as they do concrete objects once the vast and complex conceptual background that is provided by the EVENT-STRUCTURE metaphor is taken for granted. – 86

Sometimes, both literal reading and the reading under the EVENT-STRUCTURE metaphor are simultaneously possible. – 87

the object NPs instantiating the landmark mainly stemmed from the semantic fields of difficulties and problems, indicating that the EVENT-STRUCTURE metaphor indeed provides the basis for the extension of the meaning of ‘to face’. – 87

The particle up in its central sense denotes verticality in oriented physical space, a notion that has arisen out of our bodily experience (of gravity), i.e. the relative position of head and feet to each other when we stand, sit or move. Thus, an experiential correlation exists between verticality and being awake, active and conscious; giving rise to such well-known conceptual metaphors as ACTIVE IS UP, WELL-BEING IS UP, RATIONAL IS UP, CONTROL IS UP. – 89

We can state that the use of up is due to the conceptual metaphor CLOSE IS UP, which captures the experiential fact that things which come closer to an observer rise in his/her visual field, as in: ‘She came up to me.’

any entity approaching another entity being the deictic centre can be seen as coming up the latter. up, therefore, can denote “increasing proximity” or the movement of a trajector to a landmark that is the deictic centre. – 90

No comments:

Post a Comment